The beauty industry has been facing scrutiny over products for some time now. BUt more recently, safety and environmental impact have been high on the agenda. A significant concern is the presence of “forever chemicals,” specifically per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), in cosmetics. These substances are known for their persistence in the environment. They also have recognised health risks, prompting regulatory bodies, industry leaders, and consumers to start taking action.
The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has been at the forefront of addressing PFAS in cosmetics. A pilot project revealed that approximately 6% of nearly 4,500 cosmetic products inspected contained hazardous chemicals like PFOA, PFCAs, and cyclic siloxanes (D4 and D5), which are banned or restricted due to their environmental and health risks.
In response, several European countries have proposed restrictions on PFAS, aiming to reduce their use in consumer products, including cosmetics. This initiative aligns with a broader European strategy to phase out these chemicals unless deemed essential with no safer alternatives available.
PFAS exposure has been linked to various health issues. Some of these include cancer, liver damage, immune system effects, and developmental problems in children. Their ability to accumulate in the body over time exacerbates these risks. Environmentally, PFAS are notorious for their extreme persistence. They lead to widespread contamination of water, soil, and wildlife. This enduring presence raises alarms about long-term ecological damage and sustainability.
Industry Response
In light of regulatory pressures and growing consumer awareness, many cosmetics companies are reformulating their products to exclude PFAS. Brands like Revolution, Inglot, and Urban Decay have publicly committed to phasing out these substances. The industry is also exploring alternatives that offer similar benefits in terms of product longevity and performance without the associated environmental and health drawbacks.
Consumers are becoming increasingly weary about what goes into their skincare and makeup. Demands for transparency and safer formulation keep increasing. For this reason, the market has been increasingly favorable to products with eco-labels or those being clearly marketed as PFAS-free. The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics is one advocacy group that supports demands for strict regulations on the use of harmful substances in cosmetics and calls for outright bans on them, much as has been taken by the European Union.
While Europe is taking proactive steps, other regions like the United States are also beginning to address PFAS through legislation like the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act (MoCRA) and state-specific laws, though often with less stringent oversight compared to the EU.
Common “Forever Chemicals” (PFAS) Found in Cosmetics
PFAS Chemical | Common Uses in Cosmetics |
---|---|
Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) | Water and stain repellents, surfactants |
Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) | Water and stain repellents, surfactants |
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) | Waterproofing agent, often used in makeup and skincare |
Perfluorooctyl Triethoxysilane | Water and stain repellents |
Perfluorononyl Dimethicone | Silicone-based products, such as foundations and serums |
How to Minimize Exposure:
- Check Product Labels: Look for products labeled “PFAS-free” or “fluorine-free.”
- Choose Natural & Organic Brands: These brands often prioritise using natural ingredients and avoid synthetic chemicals.
- Research Brands: Look for brands with transparent ingredient lists and ethical sourcing practices.
- Wash Your Face Thoroughly: Remove makeup and skincare products completely before bed to minimize skin absorption.
About the ECHA
The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) is a regulatory body of the European Union. It was established to manage the safe use of chemicals and protect human health and the environment. ECHA plays a crucial role in assessing, regulating, and restricting hazardous substances across various industries. This includes cosmetics, manufacturing, and agriculture. One of its major frameworks, the REACH regulation (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals), requires companies to register and provide safety data for chemicals produced or sold within the EU.
A Big Shift
The heightened awareness and regulatory actions surrounding PFAS in cosmetics signify a major shift. We are now moving towards safer and more sustainable beauty products. As consumers continue to demand transparency and healthier options, the industry is likely to respond. Calls for more accountability are also increasing. Lawsuits against pharmaceuticals and other companies in the United States and beyond, have made brands more cautious.
According to a report by Grand View Research, the global natural cosmetics market is expected to reach $54.5 billion by 2027, growing at a CAGR of 5.01% from 2020 to 2027. The industry’s move towards formulations with fewer chemicals, is unfortunately not proactive enough. It is driven by consumer preferences and regulatory mandates. But should this really be the case?